(De)Constructing Timbre at NIME: Reflecting on Technology and Aesthetic Entanglements in Instrument Design

Charalampos Saitis; Courtney N. Reed; Ashley Laurent Noel-Hirst; Giacomo Lepri; Andrew McPherson

(De)Constructing Timbre at NIME: Reflecting on Technology and Aesthetic Entanglements in Instrument Design
Image credit: Charalampos Saitis; Courtney N. Reed; Ashley Laurent Noel-Hirst; Giacomo Lepri; Andrew McPherson
  • Format: oral
  • Session: papers-7
  • Presence: remote
  • Duration: 15
  • Type: long

Abstract:

Timbre, pitch, and timing are often relevant in digital musical instrument (DMI) design. Compared with the latter two, timbre is neither easy to define nor discretise when negotiating audio representations and gesture-sound mappings. We conduct a corpus assisted discourse analysis of timbre'' in all NIME proceedings to date (2001--2024). Combining this with a detailed review of 18 timbre-focused papers at NIME, we examine how definitions of timbre and timbre interaction methods are constructed through, for instance, Wessel's numerical timbre control space, synthesis tools and programming languages, machine learning and AI approaches, and other trends in digital lutherie practices. While acknowledging the practical utility of technical constructions of timbre in NIME (and other digital music research communities), we contribute discussion on the entanglement of technology and aesthetics in instrument design, which constitutes whattimbre’’ becomes in NIME research and reflect on the tension between technoscientific and constructivist understandings of timbre: how DMIs and musical practices have been reconstituted around particular timbral values operationalised in NIME. In response, we propose ways that the NIME community can embrace more critical approaches and awareness to how our methods and tools shape and co-create our notions of timbre, as well as other musical concepts, connecting more openly with diverse types of sonic phenomena.